Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> My preference is that we do this for 2.1. We still need to do some more
> bugixing in 2.0 (the Mozilla behaviour for instance) and some
> optimizations (see if we have queries that can be optimized or done away
> with)
Perhaps we should set up the version numbering like the Linux kernel;
version 2.1 will be a development series and 2.2 will be stable again.
There's a lot of stuff that we're holding for 2.1 and I'm concerned that
we'll need a lot of development releases to get them tested and stabilized.
> Changing dbmail-adduser will probably not break to much. Can't we
> program it to accept the same syntax as now, plus all the sane features
> it should have?
Unfortunately, getopt would choke hard on the current syntax. I'm probably
not going to be nearly as helpful with debugging the IMAP stuff as I have
been with the delivery, LMTP and general weirdness stuff, so I'm hoping to
help clarify and improve upon other parts of the system.
> Ilja
>
> Aaron Stone wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > So I was looking at dbmail-adduser today, trying to remember how to use
the
> > crazy thing... and I'd like to scrap the current command line interface
and
> > replace it with something clean and GNU-ish, using getopt, and without
crazy
> > position dependent overloaded single characters.
> >
> > Since I'm sure a lot of people might already have scripts to control
> > dbmail-adduser, would you prefer if I rewrote the command line in time
for
> > 2.0, or would you not mind if it changed dramatically between 2.0 and
2.1?
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dbmail-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Dbmail-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
>
--
