> > This last part is already done - message headers go into the first > > messageblks row, the message body is in all subsequent rows - so that's > > exactly what the flag would do. It would also allow you to have more > > than one messageblks row that contained headers, which if I understand > > correctly, cannot be done right now (so if you had a huge amount of > > headers (and the rfc's place no limit on that), it would currently > > break, but with adding a flag for them, it could be made to work). > > Being able to handle oversized headers is important to maintain compliance > with an implication of the RFC; there indeed is no limit on headers.
FYI, I did some brief testing and it seems if you have > 512k headers (ie. the max size of a messageblks entry), it silently drops the message. Doesn't get delivered or bounced or stuck in mail queue. :( -- Jesse Norell [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my email address; change "administrator" to my first name. --
