""Jesse Norell"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Ok, I just thought this through again, and at the moment our only option is > > fgetc with one character at a time. Anything that's line-at-a-time is not > > binary safe (correct this assumption and we're home free, though). Block at > > a > > time, like fread, is not sensitive to the header/body boundary. It is > > inevitable (and I must have missed it by testing with my usual dumb three > > line > > headers) that read_header() will fread a bit into the body. So we'd have to > > either unread the extra stuff or pass an initial body along the delivery > > chain. Neither is a pretty option (how much you can push back, if at all, is > > highly system dependent). > > Perhaps you could fgetc() through the headers, and once you hit the body > use fread() for performance?
Not a bad idea at all! I'll try just chaning the read_header function, and folks please check CVS again in a few hours to see if it's working right. Aaron > > > -- > Jesse Norell > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my email address; > change "administrator" to my first name. > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Dbmail-dev mailing list > Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org > http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev > --
