Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Yup.. that's solution number four. > > Because it's such a recent addition, (almost) nobody has been using it. > So there's less pain when we remove it. > I agree with Paul on this. Adding user+mailbox address support recently > was a mistake. I shouldn't have committed that code. It can be added > later. Removing it will take away the problem mentioned above. > > I'll get to it then.
I just committed this and a few other new ideas to the TODO list. IIRC, all of the changes related to address+mailbox are contained in main.c, CVS revisions 1.61 - 1.63. Aaron --
