On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:32:39AM -0700, Kevin Baker wrote: > > >> A prev message in thread discussed this solution in > >> project. Apparently it works great. > > > > Are you referring to Simon Cocking's message? I don't > > think he was > > referring to IMAP. > > > > Right that was the message I was referring to. He was > talking about message routing through his system. While it > is not IMAP it touches on all the same issues and seems to > work well.
I'm sure the unique id problem can be solved in a multiple master setup, but I'm not sure about the increment-only IMAP requirement without some kind of global locking scheme. I look forward to being proven wrong, though. xn
