> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 04:24:38PM +0200, Paul J Stevens wrote: >> Agreed. And that's what I'm working on already. However, doing so would >> be >> a lot easier if we implement some kind of test-frame. >> > Its not a solution, tho it may help. A real solution as I said earlier is > to simplify processes, enhance function calls, and probably remove hand > crafted parsers for ones which are created by bison. This would really > help > because then there is always a maintainable interface to the parser and > bison > generally tries to optimize to efficiency.
I belive i have the starting of the bison grammer worked out using another GPL'ed project so I was going to focus on that when I had the next block of time I will be send a patch in a few days for the GList replacement for the current list code this will make things a lot cleaner and more elegant in my mind or rather how it works is more elegant. On another note paul you have a patch you can send me directly on that Gmime code so I can check that out and maybe help? On another note.... Aaron have you had a moment to look at the sieve patch and see if you can put it into cvs head? If not wait I guess as it needs some work to be thread safe *shrug* like I said it was just a framework when I did it. Thanks, Leif
