""Wolfram A. Kraushaar"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote: > >>I would appreciate the following options: >>-Log to database or syslog >>-Option to buffer logging to database (and syslog?) >> This enables us to take advantage of transactions support aswell. >>-Possibility to specify some other host and database for logging >> This is very good for heavily loaded mail systems. >>-Max log age parameter (cleanup util does the deletions at night) >>-Max log size in records/size (cleanup util does the deletions at night) >> >> > Most of that could be done with msyslog right now, without > touching the code at all. I think it is best to be as dumb about this as possible. If syslog and its workalikes can be leveraged to do the dirty work, then why should we also get our hands dirty? Aaron --
