The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
======================================================================
http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0000113
======================================================================
Reported By:                aaron
Assigned To:                
======================================================================
Project:                    DBMail
Bug ID:                     113
Category:                   Database layer
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
======================================================================
Date Submitted:             02-Nov-04 00:58 CET
Last Modified:              02-Nov-04 00:58 CET
======================================================================
Summary:                    IMAP Search should parse only headers and retrieve 
only potential matches
Description: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

> Currently, the code uses db_fetch_headers() for every message in the
> search cycle. Despite the name, this function actually parses the
entire
> message, multipart boundaries and all. (Misleading function names are
> possibly the worst thing about this code...)
> 
> But, for header field searches, one could do with only parsing the main
> header. This action is already available in the current code, as
> db_get_main_header(); but it is only used for IMAP FETCH.

In combination with a query that asks the database to only return
potential matches, this should make search much, much faster. I'm going to
file it as a bug so that we make sure to get this into 2.0.x ASAP.
======================================================================

Bug History
Date Modified  Username       Field                    Change              
======================================================================
02-Nov-04 00:58aaron          New Bug                                      
======================================================================

Reply via email to