On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 16:57, Mikhail Ramendik wrote: > Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote: > > > Couldn't this be solved by having a headers table like this? > > > > Create table headers( > > hid serial primary key, > > physmessage_id int not null, > > header varchar not null, > > value varchar not null, > > ); > > This and similar solutions were discussed and definitely are the way to > go - but not for the 2.0.x series, which should be backwards compatible > on database structure.
Well, this would actually be fully backwards compatible since there are no changes to existing tables and contents, only additions. But I fully agree.. NOT 2.0 series. Not because of database but because of the necessary code additions in a stable tree. -=Dead2=-
