Mikhail Ramendik wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
The bug appears to be very subtle. When I was backing out Mikhail's
patches one at a time, there was a one-line hunk of the dbmysql_v2.patch
that didn't reverse because it had not been applied.
This probably means that the first version of the dbmysql patch was
applied. It did contain a subtle bug, which I fixed in the second
version (duly warning the list about it).
Since it was I who decided to apply those patches it was my mistake. I know I heeded your warning and added
the res_changed=1 in db_get_length. Turns out I did so in cvs-head, but forgot to update the patchset for 2_0.
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul Stevens mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NET FACILITIES GROUP PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
