Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >>> The point of the bzero(3) call is so that you don't have to set data, >>> dsize, nextnode, etc. to NULL. I'd remove those for now, they're not >>> needed. Is there a list init call that needs to be added to imap4.c, >>> similar to what was applied to pop3.c? -sc >> >> Does my patch fix your bug with POP3? Please, please test it. > > I don't use pop3 and haven't had any problems with pop3, yet. :) -sc
Ahhh! Ok, so who has the pop3 bug, and did we determine if the pop3 and imap bugs are even related? I think Paul had some wise words about this a few weeks ago, but I don't recall at all. Aaron
