Drew Northup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > oops......., you don't want the "w" flag set on the mailer, since the > DBMail users won't likely have a valid local account......... > > I knew I had left that out for the first time for a good reason. > > Aaron, what about sending a patch against local.m4 for inclusion? That > seems like a decent solution, since we can't very well include local.m4 > itself, and we need a lot of the stuff from local.m4 (all except the > actual local mailer definition, in fact). Ideas? I'm going to try to > get a hold of somebody from sendmail about this license problem.
What's the license problem? If it's a reformed BSD license (advertising clause removed) then it's GPL compatible. Just not vice-versa. Once upon a time when I used Sendmail, I recall being able to include bits of m4 into the configuration macro file. There's gotta be a process for this that doesn't require distributing anything but a snippet of m4 and an activation macro. Aaron
