Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > We *do* have the column to set it. I'll have a look at the RFC, to see > what's needed for the SETQUOTA command. If we can't do that without > changing too much, then the solution proposed by Wolfram is the way to > go for now.
I read the RFC, and along with it being terse to the point of (IMHO) inadequately describing what's happening, it basically looks like it's a way for a user to set their own restrictions. That might make sense if we supported per-mailbox quotas and message limits (I don't think we have the column for that, though, but I haven't looked recently) but since we only support per-user quotas, they should be read-only. Who lets a user change their own primary quota!? Aaron
