Don't worry bro. The transactional inserts dpatch was only done earlier this week at the explicit request of a user. Other than that, the 2.0.2 packages contain: dynamic preforking, glib support, is_header insertion, and some debian specifics (path to dbmail.conf, and path to pid dir). All those have been in cvs-head for ages, err some time now anyway.

That said, I think we should start thinking about setting a schedule for 2.1.0.


Aaron Stone wrote:
What else do you have in that Debian package of yours? You should get
involved with the upstream distribution and see if you can get some of
that stuff in!

:-P

Aaron


Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:


I have a dpatch ready for commitment that backports the transaction support
in the insertion chain from cvs-head to 2.0

It's in the 2.0.2-0.20041212 debian packages, but I can commit it *now*.

Aaron Stone wrote:


So, a detail that I hope a PostgreSQL person can answer definitively: will
wrapping the delivery into a transaction prevent rows that are eventually
deleted from even hitting the database? That would probably completely
alleviate the need for heavy vacuuming.

_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev


--
  ________________________________________________________________
  Paul Stevens                                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
  The Netherlands_______________________________________www.nfg.nl

Reply via email to