Don't worry bro. The transactional inserts dpatch was only done earlier this
week at the explicit request of a user. Other than that, the 2.0.2 packages
contain: dynamic preforking, glib support, is_header insertion, and some debian
specifics (path to dbmail.conf, and path to pid dir). All those have been in
cvs-head for ages, err some time now anyway.
That said, I think we should start thinking about setting a schedule for 2.1.0.
Aaron Stone wrote:
What else do you have in that Debian package of yours? You should get
involved with the upstream distribution and see if you can get some of
that stuff in!
:-P
Aaron
Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I have a dpatch ready for commitment that backports the transaction support
in the insertion chain from cvs-head to 2.0
It's in the 2.0.2-0.20041212 debian packages, but I can commit it *now*.
Aaron Stone wrote:
So, a detail that I hope a PostgreSQL person can answer definitively: will
wrapping the delivery into a transaction prevent rows that are eventually
deleted from even hitting the database? That would probably completely
alleviate the need for heavy vacuuming.
_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
The Netherlands_______________________________________www.nfg.nl