Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote:
We can *easily* switch to storing attachments separately. The whole messageblk approach will support this
flawlessly. In fact, I can switch to storing attachments in separate blks today, and noone will notice because
it will be transparant from the point of view of message retrieval.
I hope this comment was geared towards 2.1 and not 2.0.
Of course. Changes in the stable series should always be 100% backward
compatible. What I'm describing above is no more than a possibility that *may*
happen in the future, not something I'm actually working on.
--
________________________________________________________________
Paul Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
The Netherlands_______________________________________www.nfg.nl
