On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:46:17 -0000, Aaron Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005, Ewald Geschwinde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > I tested something with my dbmail. > > > > I have now deleted teh user [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > and only the aliases to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] exists like that > > > > 17 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > > 0 > > 20 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 15 | > > 0 > > > > when I'm sending now a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > he does not fin aliases > > > > Is it not true when theuser is not found then he checks the aliases > > table whether an alias for this user exists? > > This behavior changed from DBMail 1.2 to 2.0, we are now working on making > it properly backwards compatible with DBMail 1.2. > > What you are seeing here is correct in DBMail 1.2: you *must* have an > alias for every address that you receive. > > DBMail 2.0 adds a check of the users table, making it easier for sites > with username-are-full-addresses, but that was accidentally mutually > exclusive with the alias lookups, and hence the bug you can see in DBMail > 2.0. > > Aaron >
what do I have to do to get this working in 1.2.11? the user ist [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the alias address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I only want that all Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ewald Geschwinde
