On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:54:09 +0100, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Aaron Stone wrote: > > We're not getting to 2.1 anytime soon, > > Not true. cvs-head doesn't have many, if any, regressions at the moment. It > already has fixed a significant number of bugs that are marked as wont-fix > for 2.0 > > If we make a concerted effort, 2.1.0 can be released in no time at all. In > fact, > I'd very much like to release 2.1.0 before I start depending on the header > tables. > > Ilja, I'll prepare cvs-head for 2.1.0 release (tag dbmail_2_1_0_release) > today. > I just committed all remaining pending changes before 2.1.0 and will start > testing with different clients before I do the actual tagging. Can you release > later this week if I give the go ahead signal? >
No problem. We'll label this as a development release I reckon? cheers, Ilja
