A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
======================================================================
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0000212
======================================================================
Reported By:                sty
Assigned To:                
======================================================================
Project:                    DBMail
Bug ID:                     212
Category:                   LMTP daemon
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   trivial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
======================================================================
Date Submitted:             02-Jun-05 06:39 CEST
Last Modified:              02-Jun-05 09:25 CEST
======================================================================
Summary:                    lmtp doesn't conform RFC on return code after DATA
Description: 
After DATA, lmtp replies with "215 Recipient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK" when the 
correct
response would be "250 OK".

Although the RFC implies that the server "interpret only the first digit
of the reply and MUST be prepared to deal with unrecognized reply codes by
interpreting the first digit only."

Anyways, not all servers are prepared to deal with non-standard return
codes and crash/barf, which I found out with the DSpam LMTPd (fixed now in
cvs of dspam).
======================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 paul - 02-Jun-05 09:25 CEST 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't get it. The title of the bug reports states that dbmail-lmtpd
doesn't conform to the RFC, whereas the report indicates it's dspams that
didn't adhere. Where's the bug here??? RFC821 is very clear on this issue,
but maybe I'm looking at the wrong section. Aaron??

Bug History
Date Modified  Username       Field                    Change              
======================================================================
02-Jun-05 06:39sty            New Bug                                      
02-Jun-05 09:25paul           Bugnote Added: 0000721                       
======================================================================

Reply via email to