Paul J Stevens wrote: > Brandon, > > why reinvent the wheel here? Either use imap where access is restricted > to your client, or build a client that links directly to libdbmail. > > Please take not that 2.1 development is under way, and the tables will > change a bit here and there as we add new features or improve > performance. Imap is very much the interface of choice until we manage > to make libdbmail a truly shareable library, and provide cross language > interfaces to the data storage.
FWIW, IMAP sucks badly when it's used as a backend for large scaled webmailers, I chose DBMail because it offers the possibility to access mailboxes directly through SQL... [...] Just my two cents :) Cheers, Igor
