The following bug has been RESOLVED.
======================================================================
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0000007
======================================================================
Reported By:                Dead2
Assigned To:                paul
======================================================================
Project:                    DBMail
Bug ID:                     7
Category:                   General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     resolved
Resolution:                 fixed
======================================================================
Date Submitted:             09-Jul-04 12:42 CEST
Last Modified:              22-Aug-05 10:31 CEST
======================================================================
Summary:                    Separate Headers table
Description: 
The headers should be put in a a separate table to facilitate faster
searching and better logic

This would remove the 'messageblk->is_header'.
It would then add a table containing only the headers.

Positive sides:
-Smaller index to search when getting header info
-Better separation leading to good logic
-Makes it possible to have different storage policies for header and
messagebody

Negative sides:
-Not backwards compatible
======================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 ilja - 09-Jul-04 14:45 CEST 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This might be interesting. I don't know what the consquences might be. We
should discuss this on dbmail-dev.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 ljackson - 15-Sep-04 19:59 CEST 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I belive that this would not give us any more performance, time should be
focused on header caching that will give the most improment to a lot of
things and let me finish my sorting code and write a really kicking THREAD
implementation.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 jnorell - 08-Nov-04 18:05 CET 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like there is no ticket open to track header (or rather, message
data) caching ... maybe there was a discussion on the old dbmail wiki. 
Also see
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=786484&group_id=85894&atid=577645

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 paul - 22-Aug-05 10:31 CEST 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
closing this bug since it's done in 2.1.x

Bug History
Date Modified  Username       Field                    Change              
======================================================================
09-Jul-04 12:42Dead2          New Bug                                      
09-Jul-04 14:45ilja           Bugnote Added: 0000011                       
09-Jul-04 14:45ilja           Status                   new => acknowledged 
15-Sep-04 19:59ljackson       Bugnote Added: 0000259                       
08-Nov-04 18:05jnorell        Bugnote Added: 0000348                       
22-Aug-05 10:31paul           Bugnote Added: 0000855                       
22-Aug-05 10:31paul           Assigned To               => paul            
22-Aug-05 10:31paul           Resolution               open => fixed       
22-Aug-05 10:31paul           Status                   acknowledged => resolved
======================================================================

Reply via email to