On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 13:12 -0400, Geo Carncross wrote: > On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 08:25 -0700, Aaron Stone wrote: > > This drives me bonkers. I would have liked to see new IMAP rfc's go in > > the other direction by specifying MORE magic mailboxes. > > I think allowing something like KEYWORDs or ANNOTATIONs on > folders/mailboxes is the way to go. > > It'd certainly go a long way to allowing clients to interoperate their > magic folders- simply look for the folder with the +SENTBOX keyword on > it.
There's this beast: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-imapext-annotate-15.txt it appears to apply only to messages and not to mailboxes. I might be interesting to implement for a shared help center type mailbox, but otherwise, it's a beast. I'm all for formalizing this and writing an IMAP extension RFC if there isn't already one in the works. Aaron
