SM is definitely a big downstream application that we should do performance profiling with. Matt, if you could post a loglevel 5 trace that contains the SORT commands that SM send, we can put the command through the ringer.
Aaron On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 12:26 -0400, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > Hello all. One of the things I have been hoping to be true about the > development branch of DBMail is that Squirrelmail would be faster. I > thought that with the server side sorting and threading that it would > make a big difference, but so far in my limited testing, I'm not seeing > any real noticeable improvement. At this point I think it might be a > configuration issue, but I did set SM for server side sorting etc... > > Any advice on SM performance issues with 2.1? Anyone seeing anything > different? > > BTW, This is CentOS 4.3 with PostgreSQL 8.1 and Squirrelmail 1.4.6. > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > Dbmail-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
