Aaron Stone wrote: > On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 16:59 +0200, Paul J Stevens wrote: >> I'm sorry Aaron, but I'm rejecting your patch. It starts breaking stuff >> (sig11) all over the place, I don't have time to fix them all, and I >> don't want to leave the tree in a non-functional state. I'm leaving the >> country next week, and I would like to get 2.1.7 out before then. > > Bah, crap. I'll see about un-segfaulting in the next 24 hours.
Perhaps we should cut a branch for 2.2, and keep the untested changes in trunk. That way, I can use branch_2_2 for releasing 2.1.7 as a final pre-2.2 cut, and do 2.2.x from there. >>> - Sieve support updated for libSieve 2.1.11. (sortsieve.c) >> Is there still api compatiblity with 2.1.10? > > Keep this. I am not guaranteeing anything along the libSieve 2.1 series. You're saying I shouldn't use sieve-2.1.11 for the packages? -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
