Marc Dirix wrote: > Is it just me, or are the referencing fields sometimes a bit confusingly > named in the dbmail tables? > > I.e. in dbmail_users I have user_idnr, which is deliver_to in > dbmail_aliases which is > which is owner_idnr in dbmail_mailboxes.
Yo! deliver_to is *not* a referencing field. It's freeform. But you do have a point. Cleaning up the table names and key fields is a TODO for the 2.3 series. > > I know this is possibly kept from old code, but when revising for a new > stable it might be good to > unify the naming scheme. > > Marc > _______________________________________________ > Dbmail-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev > -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
