I opened and then promptly resolved bug # 449 to document this issue and the fix that is now in SVN.
I would very much like to see that each non-trivial* change in the 2.2.x series is identified with a bug number. (* where trivial means something like a change to the Debian packaging, or a typo in a comment or something otherwise non-code-related.) Aaron On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 20:11 -0800, Aaron Stone wrote: > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 23:31 +0000, Aaron Stone wrote: > > > > What happens in 2.2.0 is somewhat similar to what is described above: a > > > child has done a O_NONBLOCK when another does F_GETFL. This way, the > > > client socket ends up being non-blocking - which is not what the calls > > > to fgets expect. > > Possible fix committed to SVN. Let's see if this resolves the issue. > Hopefully as simple as re-setting the flags with flags & ~ O_NONBLOCK to > be sure that there isn't a nonblocking bit. > > Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > Dbmail-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
