On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 11:37 +1100, Jake Anderson wrote: > Aaron Stone wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 18:46 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > paul - 09-Dec-06 18:46 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > I've been busy running valgrind, and I can't find *any* significant leaks > > > either. But I am working on reducing memory usage in dbmail-message.c by > > > doing less copying which may affect this bug when I merge that change. > > > > > > > Maybe there aren't any memory leaks at all? Maybe we're keeping perfect > > track of the memory, but just using too much of it and never shrinking. > > > > A massif graph like the one posted a year or so ago showing memory usage > > growth in some early 2.1 code would be really helpful. (see bug 139) > > > > Aaron > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dbmail-dev mailing list > > Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org > > http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev > > > how much do ya love me ;->
Awesome! In order to find out who's calling those g_reallocs that are taking up so much space, I believe we need a large --depth. Could you re-run your test, say with --depth=20? > i'll attempt also putting these in the bug track thingie > this is the result of copying 100 emails (give or take) with imapcopy Cool, thanks! Aaron
