The following issue has been RESOLVED. 
====================================================================== 
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=488 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                alex
Assigned To:                aaron
====================================================================== 
Project:                    DBMail
Issue ID:                   488
Category:                   Sieve (delivery, dbmail-sievecmd, dbmail-timsieved)
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   trivial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     resolved
target:                      
Resolution:                 no change required
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             08-Jan-07 20:36 CET
Last Modified:              20-Jan-07 23:59 CET
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    dbmail ignores values in :addresses in sieve
vacation
Description: 
dbmail sends automatic reply when using sieve vacation, although the alias
is not present in the :addresses list in the sieve script for that user.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 aaron - 18-Jan-07 21:28  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Actually this might be a libSieve bug, even though on the mailing list I
said it was probably DBMail's fault. I'll look into it more carefully this
week. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 aaron - 20-Jan-07 23:59  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Ok, this isn't a bug at all. The :addresses parameter basically does not
apply to DBMail, because it is only possible for a message to wind up in
your mailbox if it came through an alias known to DBMail.

The :addresses parameter is not used as an exclusionary device, according
to draft-ietf-vacation-06, but rather only to add additional addresses
that should be responded to. If you believe that the presence of
:addresses should define the *complete* set of recipient addresses to
respond to, you or I can bring this up on the IETF Sieve WG list. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
08-Jan-07 20:36 alex           New Issue                                    
18-Jan-07 21:28 aaron          Note Added: 0001727                          
20-Jan-07 23:59 aaron          Status                   new => resolved     
20-Jan-07 23:59 aaron          Resolution               open => no change
required
20-Jan-07 23:59 aaron          Assigned To               => aaron           
20-Jan-07 23:59 aaron          Note Added: 0001741                          
======================================================================

_______________________________________________
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev

Reply via email to