James Cloos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> "John" == John T Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > John> Since I do not know how long the ldap_start_tls_s function has > John> been a part of OpenLDAP, > > It looks like the cvs tag OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_1 was the first after the > function ldap_start_tls() in open.c was renamed to ldap_start_tls_s() > and moved to tls.c. > > The $id$ is: > > $OpenLDAP: pkg/ldap/libraries/libldap/open.c,v 1.59 2000/06/13 18:45:30 kurt > Exp $ > > The ldap_start_tls() function was new in 2.0. > > So everyone using dbmail with ldap auth should have a recent enough > version of openldap to use your patch as posted.
So should I repost the patch without the HAVE_LDAP_START_TLS_S preprocessor symbols since ldap_start_tls_s is so old, or should I leave the patch as is? Thank you for your consideration. John Guthrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Dbmail-dev mailing list [email protected] http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
