> Recently we were discussing doing the moves based on a per user basis, > but with some installations of 1000's of users, this seems silly. The > end result is still going to be that you want to move all messages to > the new storage structure. It took about 1.5-2 hours to move 350K > physmessages on my box. The messageblks table started optimized at > 6.6GB.
Hum, I have to make some tests after 2.3.5 then, it's always better to move everything to only one storage to not lose something in the future (forgot that there were message on the 2.2x storage engine for example). When 2.3.6 go out I'll give it a try (but only after someone test it first, this time I won't be the beta-tester :P Thanks John, Jorge, _______________________________________________ Dbmail-dev mailing list Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
