Thanks for the help....
I don't need the feature THAT badly that I'd monkey with the code...
If it becomes a feature later on, that'd be cool... :)
What I supposed I REALLY should do is just add some anti spam stuff...
Thanks for your help though...
Doug
Jesse Norell wrote:
Hello,
Something along the lines of the following could work - in
a bit of testing, you actually have to have a userid of user@
for this method to work, it'd be nice if you could just specify
an alias (but I don't want to mess with that right now :).
Disclaimer: please don't use in production w/o testing; it may
not work.
diff -u pipe.c newpipe.c
--- pipe.c 2003-03-17 09:04:08.000000000 -0700
+++ newpipe.c 2003-10-08 09:00:29.000000000 -0600
@@ -224,13 +224,38 @@
"checking for domain aliases. Domain = [%s]",domain);
/* checking for domain aliases */
- auth_check_user(domain,&userids,-1);
+ this_user = auth_check_user(domain,&userids,-1);
trace (TRACE_DEBUG,"insert_messages(): "
"domain [%s] found total of [%d] aliases",domain,
userids.total_nodes);
}
}
+ /* we did not find any direct delivers for this user
+ nor any domain forwards - try user catch-all */
+ if (this_user==0)
+ {
+ trace (TRACE_INFO,"insert_messages(): domain forwards found to
deliver to. "
+ "Checking for user catch-alls");
+
+ strncpy((char *)tmp->data,userid_string,MAX_U64_STRINGSIZE -1);
+ userid_string[MAX_U64_STRINGSIZE] = '\0';
+
+ if (strchr((char *)userid_string, '@')!=NULL)
+ {
+ strchr((char *)userid_string, '@')[1] = '\0';
+
+ trace (TRACE_DEBUG,"insert_messages(): "
+ "checking for user catch-alls. User =
[%s]",userid_string);
+
+ /* checking for user catch-alls */
+ auth_check_user(userid_string,&userids,-1);
+ trace (TRACE_DEBUG,"insert_messages(): "
+ "user [%s] found total of [%d]
aliases",userid_string,
+ userids.total_nodes);
+ }
+ }
+
/* user does not exists in aliases tables
so bounce this message back with an error message */
if (userids.total_nodes==0)
---- Original Message ----
From: Jesse Norell <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] question...
Sent: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:26:42 -0600 (MDT)
Hello,
Right now that cannot be done within dbmail. You might look at
the capabilities of your mta - eg. you could do that with postfix
(I believe using the virtual map). One time, about a year ago,
someone on the irc channel asked that message and we through together
a trivial patch to allow that to happen... it might still be in
someone's irc logs (eg. probably mine), or it would be easy to
recreate. We simply changed the place where it handles domain
catchalls ("@domain.com") and had it look for a user catch-all first;
possibly that order should be reversed, but either way will be
backward compatible, as you don't have user catch-alls currently.
There are definite implications if you use postfix
local_recipient_maps pointing to the aliases table, which probably
can be handled, but I've not thought through/tested them.
---- Original Message ----
From: Doug Stanley <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Dbmail] question...
Sent: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:19:19 -0400
If I have multiple domains, is there a way I can define a single
user...say sales and so any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes all to
the same place? It gets very annoying all the junk mail randomly
sent to sales@ each of my domains...also info@ too...anyays...
Can i just put sales in the alias table instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
example?
Doug
_______________________________________________
Dbmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
-- End Original Message --
--
Jesse Norell
jesse (at) kci.net
_______________________________________________
Dbmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
-- End Original Message --
--
Jesse Norell
jesse (at) kci.net
_______________________________________________
Dbmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
