On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 16:04 -0700, Jesse Norell wrote: > Or rather, use it more intelligently.
Sorry, that was probably worded poorly. I meant that Spamassassin can do make more intelligent use of the rbl match than your mta which can only outright reject the message. That was not at all meant as an insult or anything of the sort. > Eg. use spamcop to check that And this ^^^^^^^ should have read spamassassin, not spamcop. Jesse > rbl, so it increases your spam count, not completely rejecting the > message at the mta. > [ > > On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 23:03 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote: > > So don't use spamcop <duck> > > > > Gregory S. Youngblood wrote: > > > I'm in the process of implementing new spam protections on my server. > > > > > > I noticed that messages that appear to be from the dbmail.org list are > > > being bounced. > > > > > > reject: RCPT from elnino.fastxs.net[213.214.98.20]: 554 Service > > > unavailable; Client host [213.214.98.20] blocked using bl.spamcop.net; > > > Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?213.214.98.20 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Greg > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Dbmail mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > > > > > -- Jesse Norell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kentec Communications, Inc.
