Hello Mike,
======RBL=====
I using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org which is a combination of those see:
http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/index.lasso
My complete updated list is: (Any suggestions?)
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
reject_rbl_client relays.ordb.org,
reject_rbl_client opm.blitzed.org,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client blackholes.mail-abuse.org,
reject_rbl_client relays.mail-abuse.org,
=====DSPAM=====
I don't care much about the graphs and charts in dspam it is the math
approach I like. dspam uses SpamAssassin also but it addition it
learns from your personal choices.
=====IMAP======
Yes, I meant port "993". Is there a difference between '993' and
IMAPS? I thought of it as the same thing. Like port 80=http and
443=https.
=====DBMA====
How are we doing on the DBMA?
Demi,
On 4/30/06, M. J. [Mike] OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You will find that the RBLs catch most of the junk if you use good RBLs. I
favour doing this in Postfix (extraordinarily efficient) and not in the
anti-SPAM daemon. A combination of the two can work very well also. i.e.:
have Postfix reject on the trusted RBLs and have your SPAM daemon mark as
**SPAM** on a positive from the less reliable RBLs. Make sure SpamHaus XBL
and SBL are among your up-front RBLs.
The DSPAM Project is great. With libdspam you can do a range of per user and
per group filtering. I can't say it's any better than SpamAssassin except
for the GUIs which are certainly fine. My approach to SPAM is to delete it.
Never study it. Never make graphs and charts. Just delete it. DSPAM lets you
study spam and make graphs and reports.
Did you mean port "993" for IMAPS?
best...
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Demi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DBMail mailinglist" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Shared folder
On 4/29/06, M. J. [Mike] OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sounds like dbmailadministrator/ is not writeable
> chown dbmailadministrator/ and all files to httpd user::group
This was part of your install manual so I did that but did I maybe use
the wrong user? I did www-data (Debian Sarge)
This is what it looks like:
safe:/var/www/safe/admin/dbma# l
total 772
-rwxr-xr-x 1 www-data www-data 254 2006-03-07 21:24 AUTHORS
-rwxr-xr-x 1 www-data www-data 317 2006-03-07 21:24 BUGS
-rwxr-xr-x 1 www-data www-data 21511 2006-04-18 00:49 CHANGES
-rwxr-xr-x 1 www-data www-data 391 2006-02-06 23:56 dbi-test.pl
> sri forgot Spam (SpamAssassin is likely your best choice for handling
> SPAM)
> perl -MCPAN -e shell
> CPAN> install SpamAssassin
>
> Mike
>
SpamAssassin is OK but I am really sick of spam. I been checking and
dspam seams to be good. What do you think of dspam?
http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com/index.shtml
--
Demi
