Ron Peterson wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:58:16PM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:06:09PM +0200, Kneschke.Lars wrote:
Ron Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
I don't see any reference to secure imap/pop on the wiki features
request page. As far as I can tell, there is no ssl/tls support yet,
correct?
Search the wiki for stunnel or follow this link:
http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=stunnel
Maybe as a stopgap, but I'd prefer native TLS.
Just to clarify, so I don't simply sound difficult (which I am anyway,
but I try to hide it...)
I've found inet (& xinet) to be a real network performance bottleneck.
I just think it would be a shame to shackle dbmail's performance
potential this way.
That's part of the reason I run stunnel as a stand alone daemon.
I'm a fan of the modular approach, so I like that stunnel is distinct
from dbmail. What do you see as the down side of that arrangement?
