Well, I've used 2.1.5 and various SVN versions, and re-installed my mime packages (with my package manager), and haven't found a resolution to this problem yet. Anyone have any ideas how I might fix this?

Steve wrote:
Paul,

Downgrading to 2.1.5 does the same thing as SVN. I'll show you the next message I sent after the downgrade:

Received: from mail1.kci.net (mail1.kci.net [64.187.64.9])\012\011by
        mail.stevecox.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96815A9AB1\012\011for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:34:47 -0600 (MDT)\012Received:
        from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\011by mail1.kci.net
        (Postfix)\012\011with ESMTP id 0BAEA29601\011for
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;\012\011Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:34:28 -0600
(MDT)\012Received: from mail1.kci.net ([127.0.0.1])\012\011by localhost (mail1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP\012\011id 00934-48
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;\011Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:34:27 -0600
        (MDT)\012Received: from [10.0.1.107] (server-net-gw.kci.net
        [64.187.64.1])\012\011by mail1.kci.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
C30DC295FB\012\011for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:34:26 -0600 (MDT)\012Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\012Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006
        16:35:15 -0600\012From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\012Reply-To:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8
        (X11/20040913)\012X-Accept-Language: en-us, en\012To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MIME xCoding Test Message\012X-Virus-Scanned:
        by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mail1\012Return-Path:
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 3335\012MIME-Version:
        1.0\012Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed\012Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit\012\012This is a test. Can you see me? Can you see me without looking at the \015\012ugly headers?
        Good!\015\012\015\012\015\012-- \015\012Steve Cox\015\012Linux User
        #365987\015\012www.stevecox.us\015\012
X-Evolution-Source: imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
From:
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:35:34 -0600
Subject: No Subject
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0


This was also dumped to stderr during the process of sending mail:

serverchild.c,PerformChildTask: incoming connection from [127.0.0.1] by pid [3405]
sort.c, sort_deliver_to_mailbox: message id=8978, size=1364 is inserted
Message does not start with From_
No message!


I've also pastebin'd all (I think) relevent log entries, highlighting the most pertinate lines. It almost looks like when postfix is prompted for the message body, it inserts a blank one. (This is one of the highlighted lines.) So it would seem that the message is already badly malformatted before it ever makes it to the LMTPD. On the other hand, the headers and message body are printed on seperate lines further down, indicating that there was some logical seperation between the two objects after the message was passed from Postfix to DBMail. The Pastebin is located here:

http://pastebin.com/666104

What's quite odd is that DBMail 2.1.3 (which was installed just before I went SVN) had some problems, but none of them were MIME related (that I could tell). Additionally, SVN Build 2064 didn't have this problem. I only upgraded to 2069 because of another issue Jorge was having. It almost looks as if something is specifically wrong with my machine, but again, I'm not for sure. I will attempt downgrading to 2.1.3 later tonight, and let you know if there is any change.


--
Steve


Paul J Stevens wrote:

Steve wrote:

Paul,

I'm also using Debian Unstable/Testing. I have only been using Linux for
a year to a year-and-a-half, so I'm a bit behind on some Linux
specifics, so when you reference gmime, I'm going to assume that's
equivilent to libgmime (which is what I see on my system). I have the
following:

www:/home/steve# dpkg -l | grep -i mime
ii  libgmime2.1               2.1.19-1                   MIME library,
unstable version
ii  libgmime2.1-dev           2.1.19-1                   MIME library,
unstable version - development



Excellent. Still, I can't reproduce your problem. Can anyone else
confirm this behaviour?





--
Steve Cox
Linux User #365987
www.stevecox.us

Reply via email to