Jochen Schroer wrote: > Hi Paul, > > after a lot of other problems related to ledger and tax i have to switch > our imap-server now very urgent. > I reanimate my dbmail playground and set up a fresh 2.1 (svn 2353) .
Make sure you track dbmail_2_2_branch or wait for 2.2.0rc1 (later today or tomorrow) > Are there any known problems with postgresql or is it stable now? > I will begin my tests in next hours, so if something goes wrong you get > feedback again :-) Let me know. There have been some changes lately on the postgres front, but they were all backed out again. > > Kind regards, > > Jochen > > >> Hi Paul, >> >> that's the benefit of using svn directly, I update the source, see what >> you have changed, compile it and it works. >> Fine, fine :-) >> OK, let's come to the next problem, I will send a new mail. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Jochen >> >>> Jochen Schroer wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> at my tests with svn 2192 and postgresql I find out that there is a huge >>>> diff if you install dbmail with mysql or postgresql. >>>> In postgresql the SQL operators "=" and "LIKE" are case-sensitive, so a >>>> simple search over headerfields failed for me because e.g. the header >>>> "subject" is saved in the database as "Subject", but thunderbird (and >>>> dbmail) make a select with "SUBJECT". >>>> Is there a plan to adapt database typical differences in near future? >>>> ( C is not my lanuage, so I have some problems to provide source, what >>>> I'm thinking about is to replace the compare operators in SQL-selects >>>> with an variable that is filled with the best matched operator for this DB. >>>> >>>> >>> That is already done in the code. But just not in this particular case. >>> Fixed in svn-trunk (2193). >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
