Tom Allison wrote: > I was porting some email from one imap server location to another and > ran into a feature of something. One of them writes message-id as > 'Message-Id' and the other writes it as 'Message-ID'. Because of this, > all the messages are forever different.
Make sure imapsync ignores both (--skipheader '/^Message-ID/i'. (assuming you are using imapsync). > > All mail is delivered from postfix and will be in the future. > > But I'm asking which of these syntaxes is correct or if there is a > right/wrong way of writing the headers? RFC2822 doesn't come right out > and say it, but all the examples therein are "Message-ID". > > RFC 822 says they are all the same. Headernames are case-insensitive. > Both? So yes, they are both correct. -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
