Martin Hierling wrote: > Aron, sure logs are easier to read the human reports, if nothing comes > up i will send a log. > > Paul, thats right. the mailbox was accessed by 3 clients, but the > message was not deleted, as they told me. when it is deleted outlook > should tell something about "UID not found".
Well, in that case ... Afaik, dbmail *never* changes UID values for messages. UID in imap parlance equals dbmail_messages.message_idnr in the DB schema. If there's code in dbmail that changes message_idnr I'm not aware of it, and that would be a bug IMO. However, I've had a similar error reported by one of my own clients. If you can produce a debug trace of what's going on, and file a formal bug, I'm sure we can track (and fix) this. Idea: maybe then outlook is *expecting* a changed UID. There's a precedent: I've seen similar outlook-quirkmode problems when outlook uses 0xffffffff instead of the rfc defined '*' atom to represent the last/max/infinite UID. -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
