Marc Dirix wrote:
> Actually we use SATA, in RAID5 with XFS. With just not 10K users.
> Works like a charm.
> However we're on Postgres, not mysql.
Any bus you choose these days is that much faster than the drive theres
no real point in getting SCSI or anything.
The only reason to choose something like that is for hot swap or similar.

Only other tip I'd make for the OP is to look at one of the other
HA/Load balance schemes to get the most benefit from your servers
otherwise your second server is just going to be making heat until you
have a failure. Better off using that to improve performance in the 99%
of the time everything is working.
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to