On Dienstag, 29. Mai 2007 Aaron Stone wrote: > > I'd say yes, but if you want authentication, you'll need lmtpd on > > the imap box anyway. > > Why?
That's for my environment only. I use rimap from saslauthd. Could I make a better solution? Didn't check that until now, it just works... > > Also, it doesn't do too much as most work is on the > > DB, which can for sure be on a separate host. > > It's one of those benchmark-for-your-environment situations. But yes, > you are right, the real scalability comes from distributing the > database load. We're in the implementation phase of a much-extended dbmail. Once things calm down a bit, I'd like to share our db schema back, it would be nice to have it in dbmail per default. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0676/846 914 666 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: EA39 8918 EDFF 0A68 ACFB 11B7 BA2D 060F 1C6F E6B0 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 1C6FE6B0
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
