On Fri, Jun 8, 2007, Michael Monnerie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:

> On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007 Tom Allison wrote:
>> But is DCC going to want you sweeping 1000's of emails a minute =A0
>> against their servers to see if they're spam yet?
> 
> I meant you calculate the DCC checksum on arrival as usual, and store it=20
> in a field. Every hour or so, you make a GROUP BY to check how often=20
> each signature got hit. And then, if you've got some extreme values=20
> (e.g. 30% of all e-mail in the last hour had the same checksum), you=20
> check this one checksum again against DCC. There's a high probability=20
> they list it as spam already, so you can reprocess your e-mail locally.=20
> That way, it's only one extra lookup on DCC.

You're absolutely right that this information would have to go into the
database. I think it would be possible to do it as add-on tables with some
foreign keys into the dbmail schema, and that way we don't have to build
it deeply into DBMail. If there's a really good case for building it in,
then I'd certainly think about doing it.

Aaron
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to