Is that so? Actually this feature is quite important for me. The rational is that there were cases in the past where users who claimed that they did not receive an important mail, where it was actually they did not open the email (ignore) and simply put the blame on the email system.
This is the time when the system admins need to defend themselves (and the system). Such mail log could be crucial for them. If the mail log only shows delivery receipt for the virtual email then there will be room for argument such as:- - Does the mail really delivered to the mailbox? - Does the user already in the virtual list at the time of mail delivery as mail admin could be at fault as he maybe forgot to include the email user into the virtual list and only add them later when dispute arises to cover his fault. I hope there will be solution to this matter. -- Regards Jamalulkhair Khairedin R&D Team Open Source Competency Centre (OSCC), Lot E302-E304, Enterprise Building 3, 63000 Cyberjaya, Malaysia. Tel. 603 83191200, Fax: 603 83193206 My personal blog http://www.ridinglinux.org On Tuesday 11 September 2007 10:59, Aaron Stone wrote: > This reporting is only at a much higher trace level. There is no concise > reporting for final mailbox delivery. I like the idea, however! > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007, Jamalulkhair Khairedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Dear All, > > > > We managed to install dbmail within our working environment and the > > system is working fine so far. We were using traditional mbox-style > > Postfix previously and the migration went smoothly. > > > > But there is one thing that slightly bother me. I found out that for mail > > forward (virtual list) case, the maillog did not report the final > > destination meaning (exact mailbox) of the designated recipients. > > > > Let say I have a virtual list (mail forward) named [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > and this address consists of 2 people [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], I need to see that both foo & bar appear in the > > maillog, something that helps me a lot in the past when we were using the > > traditional style postfix. This will prove that the email indeed reach > > it's final destination. So far for our new dbmail setup, the log only > > shows > > > > status=sent (215 Recipient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK) > > > > I'm not sure whether I have misconfiguration somewhere in the setup and I > > cannot find any documentation related to this issue. Can somebody point > > me to the right direction? > > > > Thank you > > > > -- > > Regards > > Jamalulkhair Khairedin > > R&D Team > > Open Source Competency Centre (OSCC), > > Lot E302-E304, Enterprise Building 3, > > 63000 Cyberjaya, Malaysia. > > Tel. 603 83191200, Fax: 603 83193206 > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DBmail mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > DBmail mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
