Aleksander Kamenik wrote: > Will this behavior be changed to the "stepped deletion" scheme? If so, > in 2.2 or 2.3?
Personally, I'm not in favor of this at all. If accidental deletion of mailboxes is what bothers you, you can configure the mailclients to move mailboxes to below Trash (like thunderbird does). If you all think we cannot live without stepped deletion of mailboxes, what is required is: - break the foreign key restraint between messages and mailboxes - setup a trigger that will update the status field of all messages when a mailbox is deleted. - make sure the integrity check run by dbmail-util no longer delete unconnected messages. So no this will not happen in the 2.2. code, but it may be done in 2.3 -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
