Paul J Stevens schrieb: > Daniel Urstöger wrote: > >>>>> That's correct. Forwarded is not a supported flag (yet). >>>> Okay, so how does a mail client recognize this? via an IMAP command to? >>> yep: the PERMANENTFLAGS line of the SELECT response. >>> >> okay, but 2.3 will change that? so at least viewing the > > Yes. I'm currently in the final phase of adding user flags support to > dbmail. When that is finished I've pretty much finished all my goals wrt > 2.3.0
this is actually great news for me :) and you say by the end of this month this will happen? >> So after fetching the emails content the rest of the workload is on the >> other server, so I can split the load a bit. >> >> The problem here is: currently the system is not loaded at all, >> but soon its gonna have about 20 000 mailboxes and about that >> many users connecting to it. So everything that could split load, >> reduce time etc. is helpful, even if it costs me a day worktime >> to get it coded / working :) > > You can also spread the dbmail load over more machines using tools like > perdition. hmm, well adding another layer to the big picture I haven´t dealt with before makes me nervous but thanks for pointing out, I will look into that possibily too. Currently I replicate the database to another server via the MySQL replication feature. Currently r eading access from my script is done from the slave MySQL server and write stuff is pushed via IMAP to the master server. I am thinking about replicating the database to the two HTML servers too, but that is prolly something I will see once the real user flood comes and uses the server all the time. Do I understand correctly that if I use MySQL replication, only the master server is able to handle IMAP connections? I assume that since if the IMAP client tries to change something within the database, hell will break loose. btw: it would be great if dbmail would support master/master replication :) >> okay, so if Content-Type is multipart you would show the attachment >> symbol for that email? Did I get that right? > > That's what I meant, yes. > but can´t it still be a message with text and same text as html junk? thanks again :) this is really helpful! _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
