Hi Paul,

Thanx for the response.  Though upgrading libsieve seems to have cured the 
issue, it's been a while since its been rebuilt and nothing has been deferred 
as of yet and we were getting it every couple of minutes, im 99% sure it was 
libsieve.

Cheers

On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:44:28 +0100, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lemme guess: you are running lmtpd from inetd? If so, you are bitten by
> a gmime bug that dumps debug output on stdout. This messes with the lmtp
> protocol. Upgrade to 2.2.8 and run daemon mode.
> 
> James Greig wrote:
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> I think you may have got it in one there.  We're using debians
> libsieve-2..2.1 package=/  The to address that the emails seem to be
> failing on most has libsieve with vacation enabled.  I'll look at updating
> libsieve.
>>
>> Cheers Pal
>>
>> Kind Regards
>>
>> James Greig
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:59:19 -0000, Aaron Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>> There have been a couple of known crash bugs with very badly formatted
>>> email addresses, although I don't think there were any in 2.2.7...
>>>
>>> Do you have any sieve scripts? There are definitely some crash bugs in
>>> libSieve < 2.2.6 with badly formatted email addresses.
>>>
>>> Aaron
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2008, James Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>>
>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully this is an issue that someone knows, but sods law it
> probably
>>> isnt.
>>>> We're currently running 2.2.7 (haven't updated ... yet).  All of a
>>> sudden since the christmas period (perhaps) we have started having a
> lot
>>> of mail sit in our postfix queue stating "lost connection with
>>> 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] while sending end of data" deferred.  It seems
> that
>>> 'particular' emails by the looks of it are being deferred whilst being
>>> passed to dbmail-lmtpd.  At first we thought that there may have been a
>>> spike over xmas of spam that's increased load a bit but increasing
> process
>>> childs, threads etc has not helped.
>>>> The majority of emails that are being deferred do appear to be spam. 
> On
>>> tailing the logs we can't see anything really in relation to errors
>>> reported by dbmail-lmtpd and it seems to be sorting (sort.c) for most
>>> other emails fine.
>>>> As noted above we think this has started since around xmas, however,
> we
>>> may be wrong as it may have been ocurring before then and we just had
> not
>>> noticed it, along with an increase of spam this may have just magnified
>>> it.
>>>> I seem to remember a mime issue that was discussed a few months back
> and
>>> was wondering if this may be related, however, I can't remember if that
>>> issue resulted in a deferr after data.
>>>> Also, on another note, anyone know of a decent way of displaying an
>>> email in postfix's deferred queue without the strange formatting?
>>>> Any help is greatly appreciated!
>>>>
>>>> Kind Regards
>>>>
>>>> James Greig
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> DBmail mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DBmail mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DBmail mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>>
> 
> 
> --
>   ________________________________________________________________
>   Paul Stevens                                      paul at nfg.nl
>   NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
>   The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
> _______________________________________________
> DBmail mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to