Marc Dirix wrote: >> >> This makes all e-mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] appear on the dbmail >> user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", as well as a forward on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simple. >> BUT if now he has an alias >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> this was already replaced with >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> 777 >> and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] would only go to local user 777 and not the >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail, and this is not easy to find. >> > > If that is the case, this surely is a regression. I did formerly use > aliasses (the one with the number) and forwards together. And they > should both be delivered.
Let me guess: your primary alias was the same as the username value? If you have: alias:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>deliver_to:777 alias:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>deliver_to:777 alias:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>deliver_to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] would only end up at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if your dbmail_users table contains: userid | user_idnr ---------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 777 and in that case the second alias mentioned above ([EMAIL PROTECTED]>777) is redundant (though harmless) -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
