I don't use or need SPF or SRS (though that may change of course) so for me there is no business case. Also I'm deep into the multifoo rewrite which I expect to take just about all my dbmail time until well after the summer. After that a number of IMAP extensions are on my wishlist, and a reliable archive (never-delete) mode. By that time 2.4 (or 3.0) will be ready for primetime which will have to play out as such things do.
Simon Lange wrote: > THUMB UP!!! > > Would be great. Although you can doit with your mta (e.g. exim). But a > native dbmail implementation would be awesome! > > Simon > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag > von Michael Monnerie > Gesendet: Freitag, 28. März 2008 19:38 > An: DBMail mailinglist > Betreff: [Dbmail] Feature request: dbmail forwarding with SRS > > http://www.openspf.org/Best_Practices/Forwarding > http://www.openspf.org/SRS > > Dear Paul and Aaron, we're heavily using SPF on all our customers domains, > and see more and more remote sites using it too. Now when receiving an > e-mail from a site using SPF, and having a dbmail alias like > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the mailserver at remote.site > has SPF checks, it complains that the sender has not allowed our mailserver > to send messages for his domain. > For this, SRS must be used. Could that be implemented? It shouldn't be too > much effort, but helps a lot. > > mfg zmi -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
