in this case you aren't matching on a blob because the encode function translates it to text, so you are actually matching on text.
> I guess things have changed in pg since I first wrote those queries. I > distinctly remember having to use HAVING + GROUP BY to be able to match > on blobs. Or maybe my memory is failing and it was mysql that had such a > requirement... > _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
