I thought I suggested that??? If you want all the messages in the old
db, then the auto_increment will be much faster and more reliable. If
you are wanting to filter out some messages such as only transfer mail
that is <1 year old, then imapsync would be a better choice for that. If
you already have mail in your new db, you can use the mysql update to
move those new messages to a new number. You will also want to update
you phsmessage_id to a number bigger than the largest on the old db.
-Jon
Paul Stevens wrote:
Curtis Maurand wrote:
Hello,
the migration is complete. I moved the following tables and
everything worked out just fine. If I need to get the messages back
in, I'll load up dbmail on a test server and use IMAPsync to transfer
the messages.
don't use imapsync for that! If you setup the other tables with the
correct auto_increment values like I suggested, you can probably
simply transfer and load dumps of the other tables. Much more
efficient than imapsync.
I've got a dump of the original database.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
