Daniel Urstöger wrote: > Talking about breaking the RFC, I wonder if I got this wrong or right: > the plan is to put another interface to the database via the dbmail > daemon, > that would offer that as additional functionality, right?
Well, 'plan' is somewhat optimistic. 'Design idea' would describe this better since no-one has actually committed any resource to implementing this :-) But you got it right otherwise. > > So actually inside the database the message will not get altered in > any way, > so I can see the message via dbmail-imap the normal way and if I connect > through the user mapped ip/port the messages will be shown without > attachments, > but will include links to download those attachments? Usermapped ip/port or via a special 'virtual' username extension '#mobile' or '#noattach' or whatever is decided on. > > I hope it got it right this way, as it seems a really nice solution, > since it won´t > break anything for the "normal" users and those who want mobile access > can use that with the implecations.. correct. -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
