Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Mittwoch 24 Juni 2009 Michael Monnerie wrote:
>> I've extended dbmail since before we started, in order to have an
>> extra "domains" and "customers" table. This has big advantages.
> 
> Nobody to comment on this? Too complicated, too harsh, or maybe just a 
> stupid idea of me?

None of the above. But your business logic is not my business logic.
Even we do very much the same in our main installation, we use LDAP to
extend the user model, so the extra tables would be redundant for us.
Also, I fail to understand how the additional tables effect dbmail
internals. My business logic builds on ldap, and doesn't require any
tweaking of the dbmail code or tables. Most of the delivery process is
handled by postfix talking to ldap - no dbmail involved. All the lmtp
server needs to be able to do is route a message (that already was
verified as destined for a valid user) to the correct user's inbox (or
sieve script).

So your idea as merit, but is more an illustration of the cool things
you can do *with* dbmail, rather than a program of what we might do *to*
dbmail.



-- 
  ________________________________________________________________
  Paul Stevens                                      paul at nfg.nl
  NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
  The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to